Here are the top highlights of the new regulations:
1 – Notable New Definitions
“Appellation of Origin” means a designation to indicate that the cannabis meets the requirements developed by the program established pursuant to section 26063 of the Act.
“Final form” refers to cannabis and cannabis products that are packaged and labeled as they will be sold at retail to a consumer.
Clarified that the definition of “Non-Volatile Solvent” includes carbon dioxide, ethanol, and nonhydrocarbon-based or other solvents such as water, vegetable glycerin, vegetable oil, animal fat, and glycerin.
“Tincture” means a solution of cannabis extract, derived either directly from the cannabis plant or from a manufactured cannabis extract, dissolved in alcohol, glycerin, or vegetable oils.
2 – Owners and Financial Interest Holder Disclosures
The new rules clarified the definition of “Owner” across all license types and provided for a single definition of Owner, as well as a single approach for processing ownership changes.
The new rules provide additional examples of individuals who qualify as Owners of a commercial cannabis business: chief executive officer, president or their equivalent, or an officer, director, vice president, general manger or their equivalent.
The threshold for disclosure of financial interest holders was raised to 10% of the total shares in both a publicly traded or privately held company.
3 – Issuance and Renewal of Provisional Licenses
DCC will stop issuing provisional licenses as of June 30, 2022;
Applications for provisional licenses will not be accepted after March 31, 2022;
After June 30, 2022 and until September 30, 2022, the DCC may in its sole discretion issue a provisional license for a cultivation if a complete application was submitted before June 30, 2022 and certain criteria were met pursuant to Section 15001.1 of the Emergency Regulations;
After June 30, 2022 and until June 30, 2023, the DCC may in its sole discretion issue a provisional license to an equity applicant.
Cultivation applications received by DCC on or after January 1, 2022, may be issued a provisional license if issuance of the license would not cause the commercial business to hold multiple cultivation licenses on a contiguous premises to exceed 1 acre of total canopy for outdoor cultivation or 22,000 sq. ft. for mixed-light or indoor.
For provisional license renewals from July 1, 2022 through July 30, 2023, the license holder must provide DCC with evidence that certain CEQA requirements have been met.
4 – Notice of Provisional License Review
DCC adopted a process for notifying licensees of its intent to suspend, revoke, or deny renewal of a provisional license.
The Notice of Provisional License Review must be in writing and state:
(i) the nature and facts of each violation;
(ii) the manner in which licensee must correct the violation; and
(iii) the disciplinary action DCC is considering.
The licensee may request an informal meeting with DCC to discuss the matter and may be accompanied by an attorney or representative.
DCC may immediately suspend any provisional license or impose licensing restrictions if necessary to protect public health, safety, or welfare.
5 – Annual License Application Requirements
DCC simplified the application process.
Applicant must identify a Designated Responsible Party who has the legal authority to bind the applicant and who shall be the primary contact for application and license-related issues.
Owners are no longer required to disclose convictions; however, DCC may request and receive certified records of all arrests and convictions from a local or state agency.
Applicants may use an aggregate surety bond when applying for multiple licenses.
DCC deleted the financial information disclosure requirements (loans, investments, gifts, and bank accounts).
DCC repealed the previously required CEQA forms; however, the regulations still provide that if the applicant doesn’t have a CEQA document from its local jurisdiction, the applicant shall submit the forms prescribed by DCC.
DCC no longer requires a distributors to submit a Certificate of Insurance, but the minimum insurance requirements still remain in effect.
6 – Branded Merchandise
Clarified that “Branded Merchandise” means non-consumable consumer goods utilized by licensee for advertising and marketing purposes (cannot sell bottles of water).
Eliminated the approval requirement for items not enumerated in the definition of branded merchandise.
After December 31, 2021, licensee’s license number must be permanently affixed and clearly visible from the outside of the branded merchandise.
Branded Merchandise must not be designed in any manner that is attractive to children.
Licensees are allowed to sell other licensees’ branded merchandise.
7 – Advertising
The restriction on advertising giveaways of non-cannabis products was removed.
A restriction on advertising giveaways of cannabis accessories was added.
8 – Trade Samples
“Trade Sample” means a limited amount of cannabis goods designated to be provided to other licensees for the purposes of targeted advertising.
Once designated as a trade sample in METRC, the designation cannot be changed.
Live plants and seeds cannot be designated as trade samples.
Only cultivators, manufacturers, distributors, and microbusinesses engaging in the aforementioned activities can designate cannabis goods as trade samples.
Retailers, cannabis event organizers, transport-only distributors, and testing labs cannot designate or provide trade samples to other licensees.
All trade samples must be packaged and labeled in accordance with the regulations for cannabis goods sold at retail.
All trade samples must be labeled with “TRADE SAMPLE. NOT FOR RESALE OR DONATION.”
Trade samples must pass all applicable laboratory testing requirements.
Trade samples may be transported by an employee of a distributor in a vehicle that is not registered to the licensee, provided the employee must comply with the possession limits of Health & Safety Code § 11357 (28.5g of cannabis or 8g of concentrated cannabis).
Licensees are limited to designating the following aggregate amounts of cannabis goods as trade samples in a calendar month period:
Dried flower: 2 pounds
Manufactured/non-manufactured cannabis products: 900 individual units
Licensees are limited to providing the following aggregate amounts of cannabis goods as trade samples to each recipient licensee in a calendar month period:
Dried flower: 5 grams per strain, and no more than 6 strains to each recipient licensee;
Manufactured/non-manufactured cannabis products: 5 individual units per cannabis product line and no more than 6 individual cannabis product lines.
9 – Labor Peace Agreement
For businesses with less than 20 employees, a labor peace agreement must be entered into within sixty (60) days of employing its 20th employee.
10 – Packaging and Labeling
Established labeling requirements for bulk products, seeds, and immature plants.
Clarified that packages of seeds are not required to be placed in child-resistant packing prior to sale.
If the immediate container holding the cannabis goods is separable from the outermost packaging, the immediate container shall be labeled with the universal symbol (previously only applied to manufactured products).
Supplemental labeling may not be used to fulfill the following labeling requirements after December 31, 2021:
The name of the licensed manufacturer (either the legal business name or DBA) that manufactured the cannabis product and the manufacturer’s contact number or website address;
Labeled cannabinoid content shall reflect the amount indicated on the Certificate of Analysis. The amount may be rounded to the nearest whole number, except that packages shall not be labeled with an amount greater than the allowable THC limits. If the THC or CBD content of a manufactured cannabis product is indicated on the Certificate of Analysis as “Not Detected” or “<LOQ,” the cannabinoid content shall be labeled as “0 mg” or “<2 mg.”
Colored bottles that obscure the color of the liquid inside shall be considered opaque v. previously only amber bottles were considered opaque.
11 – General Operating Requirements
Requires licensees that are not open to the public to establish a sign-in/sign-out procedure for all persons accessing the premises, including authorized individuals, suppliers, and visitors.
Clarifies that only agents or employees of a licensee conducting retail sales or participating in a temporary cannabis event must wear badges.
Clarified that activities must be recorded in the track and trace system within 24 hours of occurrence.
Clarified that canopy shall be of sufficient size to contain the mature plants in their entirety and that no portion of the plant can hang over an established canopy boundary.
Established complaint procedures and voluntary and mandatory recall procedures for all license types.
Working with Dom and his team has been an amazing experience, they are organized and very prompt with returning my calls and emails. I believe that communication is the key to success and I felt a strong heartbeat with the KVK Lawyer team.
KVK has been an invaluable source of guidance, legal knowledge, and proactive communication for our case with a bank service provider. Although legal proceedings can be long, GianDominic provided a clear path and strategy to having my mothers’ case resolved and settled in a positive and timely manner… many thanks and highly recommend!”
“Our lender terminated a Home Affordable Modification Trial Plan after we had been enrolled. We did not know what to do and had already been in bankruptcy. KV&K litigated a Breach of Contract lawsuit on our behalf against the lender to stop the foreclosure and get us our day in Court. To settle the lawsuit, the lender started our Trial Plan again and finalized the modification. The experience was positive because I was able to meet with the attorney and email or call with any questions during the litigation.“
“Words cannot begin to express the gratitude I have for GianDominic Vitiello. My family was in jeopardy of losing our home in foreclosure. From my initial phone call to the law of office Katchko, Vitiello & Karikomi I knew I’d made the right decision to have them assist us with our situation. Mr. Vitiello thoroughly explained our options and he consistently kept up to date on everything that was going on with the litigation. He was never too busy to explain the process to us time and time again. Mr. Vitiello genuinely cares. There is no way we could have stayed in our home without him.“
Me and my family want to thank you for all of the work you did on our case. I appreciate the way you took the time to explain the process to me and to respond to all of my questions. There was not a day that I could not get a hold of you. We are very pleased with the result. I plan on recommending your firm to everyone!
The Earley Family
We are so grateful to GianDominic and his team for helping us save our home from foreclosure. Prior to our calling their office, we had completed our trial Home Affordable Modification Agreement payments, were trying to submit our notarized documents to our lender, as well as already making our modified payments. Our lender terminated the agreement and was requiring us to reapply for a new Modification Agreement. From the moment we had our first phone meeting with GianDominic Vitiello, we knew we had found the right law firm to handle our case. A Breach of Contract lawsuit was filed on our behalf against our lender. Not long after the lawsuit was filed our lender was settling our case and finalizing our Home Affordable Modification Agreement paperwork. GianDominic thoroughly explained our options and always kept us updated. Anytime we had questions, he was available, either by email or phone. We are so happy for everything GianDominic has done for our family and we would not be in our home today without him and his team. We are forever grateful and will always recommend you to everyone we know.
Mr. and Mrs. Hernandez
“When we started with GianDominic, the demand from the other side was unacceptable to me, and my then-lawyer was advising me to settle for that number. I hired GianDominic instead and we fought the good fight for almost a year. We ended up with a settlement that was 10x better. That’s the Dom magic!”
As a single mother, nothing was more freighting than the possibility of losing my own home to foreclosure. The home my grandfather helped me buy. The house my children have called home for over 17 years. When a predatory loan servicer took over my servicing rights, they began to lose and misplace my mortgage payments. They’d call me nonstop inquiring about the payments I already made. I sent them proof of those payments and yet they still ignored all my correspondence and put my home in foreclosure with a sale date. I contacted NUMEROUS attorneys claiming to be experienced in predatory loan servicing, but they were inexperienced and not motivated to take on my case. I was BLESSED beyond words to have found GianDominic Vitiello, Anthony, and Ed [Angwin] too! Three of the kindest, compassionate and bad assed legal counsel. They were ready to take on my case and fight for me to save my home. They took an impossible situation, and saved myself, and my children’s home from being stolen and sold by this predatory servicing company. I contacted every state agency for help but they didn’t.